The lawyer for Alexey Pertsev, the developer of the cryptocurrency mixing service Tornado Cash, has characterized a Dutch court’s decision to release her client from pretrial detention as a critical move toward ensuring a fair legal process.
Pertsev, who faces charges of money laundering related to the platform being used for illicit purposes, was granted suspension of his detention on February 7, allowing him to prepare his defense outside of prison walls.
The ruling from judges at the ‘s-Hertogenbosch Court comes after Pertsev was found guilty on May 14 of last year and sentenced to five years in prison for allegedly laundering $1.2 billion in illicit cryptocurrency through Tornado Cash.
He has been held in custody since his arrest in 2022, with previous appeals for bail and requests for basic resources like computer access repeatedly denied.
Judith de Boer, Pertsev’s legal counsel, stated that she and her client “welcome the court’s decision.” Ms. de Boer had previously described her client’s prolonged pretrial detention as “unacceptable” given the complex legal questions at the heart of the case.
The decision to grant bail, she explained, represents:
A crucial step in safeguarding his right to a fair trial, as it grants the possibility to have access to resources such as something as basic as the internet.
These resources,de Boer implied, are essential for mounting an effective defense.
Controversy in Tornado Cash case
The prosecution’s case has been consistently challenged by both de Boer and the cryptocurrency community. Pertsev and his defense argue that he shouldn’t be held accountable for the actions of the individuals using Tornado Cash for illicit purposes, as merely wrote code.
Roman Storm, a co-founder of the protocol, has argued that he is being “prosecuted for writing open-source code that enables private crypto transactions in a completely non-custodial manner.”
Tornado Cash, like other cryptocurrency mixers, is designed to obfuscate the origins of digital currencies transacted on public blockchains. Proponents argue these tools are vital for user privacy in an increasingly surveilled digital landscape, while law enforcement agencies abnd regulators globally have increasingly scrutinized mixers due to their use by illicit actors to launder funds.
